That makes the assumption that sugar causes diabetes. According to Ray Peat, it does not. This is actually an ASTOUNDINGLY informative article. It's mindblowing and definitely worth a read.
Glycemia, starch, and sugar in context
Essentially, Peat claims that sugar does not cause diabetes, but rather diabetes is caused by a high intake of unsaturated fat, too much cortisol production, too much muscle meats, particularly poultry, which is rich in tryptophan, and a thyroid imbalance - basically, it's a hormonal issue, not a blood sugar issue, and it's not that sugar is unhealthy rather an epidemiological flaw - people with poor diets tend to eat lots of sugar - it's a correlator but not the cause, just like salt is demonized because it's found in the causation foods - processed meals.. Give the article a read - you won't regret it. It's making me think about my own incorporation of starch into my diet, and it's convincing enough to make me want to eat a lot less starch and a lot more fruit and sugar. I'm not comfortable with all the milk though because it seems to give me acne.
Personally, I don't believe that sugar is the cause of diabetes, and this article reassures my thought processes. I've always attributed that to grains and polyunsaturated fat intake. I have said hundreds of times that PUFA oils are the WORST thing in the SAD - far worse than grains - and he seems to agree. He even hates fatty fish like salmon...not sure if I agree with that one, but the effects of polyunsaturated fat oxidation in the body is extremely damaging, and fish oil is almost entirely unsaturated with the majority as PUFA's. Anyway, I don't think it's the carbs in the grains that make them bad but rather the anti-nutrients, inflammatory proteins and rancid fats.
Last edited by ChocoTaco369; 07-02-2012 at 10:09 AM.
07-02-2012, 10:01 AM #7